Grade: 10/12

Algorithms

- All algorithms are very sound

- All algorithms are implemented efficiently

- Results are, a bit surprisingly, not the best among the projects. 

- In the description of ILS the selection component is not described


Analysis

- Computational cost analysis present often in aggregate form which
  makes it more precise.

- The choice to use only 2 instances per class is arguable, with so few
  data results might be misleading

- It is not clear what the 500 iterations are with the construction
  heuristics, hence I am not sure I understood on which basis the
  comparison is carried out.

- In the case of Test 1, a comparison of times is commented but numerical
  results for the times do not appear anywhere.

- Test 2 it is not clear why you need a time limit for local search. It
  should stop at a local optima, or you do restart? If so it is not
  clear from the description.

- Test 3 again it is not clear what algorithm you test. Is there any RSS at all?


Report

- The language is not fluent. The construct of the sentences is often
  complicated and the subject unclear. There is lack of punctuation. In
  general, simple sentences in active form are recommendable. Avoid
  prepositions at the end of the sentence.


Code

- It works and results are correct and compliant to what written in the report.

- The code seems written taking enough care of efficiency issues.