Mid Term Evaluation
The evaluation was done on March 20, 2018. There were 9 students present. The number between parenthesis represents the number of votes received by the comment.
What has been good so far and must be kept:
-
Project: open and interesting (9)
-
Lene’s examples (9)
-
Relevant content (9)
-
Lecture notes (7)
-
High expectations (5)
What has been less good and must be changed:
-
Lectures on the project arrive too late (9)
-
Marco’s expectations for the project are intimidating (8)
-
Large difference in tempo between lectures (8)
-
More specific project description (4)
-
Some command does not work on windows (3)
-
It would be nice to see something with more objectives before the assignment (1)
Matching between approx theory and heuristics:
-
Nice to have both topics together (9)
-
Alternating between theories helps topics stay connected (8)